<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Writings on Amar Al-Zubaidi</title><link>https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/</link><description>Recent content in Writings on Amar Al-Zubaidi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What’s Actually Worth Automating</title><link>https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/whats-worth-automating/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/whats-worth-automating/</guid><description>The easiest thing to automate is rarely the thing most worth automating.</description></item><item><title>Why Better Software Loses</title><link>https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/why-better-software-loses/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://amarz45.github.io/eportfolio/writings/why-better-software-loses/</guid><description>Software persists because leaving is expensive, not because it&amp;rsquo;s good. That makes switching cost an engineering problem.</description></item></channel></rss>